People v. Dewer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dewer

138 A.D.2d 505, 526 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2842

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 505 (People v. Dewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dewer, 138 A.D.2d 505, 526 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), both rendered April 11, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under indictment No. 4614/84, and of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under indictment No. 4836/84, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen[506]*506dant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), both rendered April 11, 1985, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under indictment No. 4614/84, and of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under indictment No. 4836/84, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen[506]*506dant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 505, 526 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dewer-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack