People v. Dewberry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dewberry

217 A.D.2d 589, 628 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Dewberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dewberry, 217 A.D.2d 589, 628 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated March 1, 1993 (People v Dewberry, 191 AD2d 453), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 17, 1990, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issue of the validity of the waiver of his right to appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the application: Mark Diamond, Box 307, Ryder Station, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11234, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall prosecute the application expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated March 1, 1993 (People v Dewberry, 191 AD2d 453), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 17, 1990, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issue of the validity of the waiver of his right to appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the application: Mark Diamond, Box 307, Ryder Station, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11234, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall prosecute the application expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 589, 628 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dewberry-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack