People v. DeVita

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeVita

132 A.D.2d 616, 517 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49157

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), imposed February 10, 1986, upon his conviction of forgery in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of 60 days running concurrently therewith and as a condition thereof, three years’ probation with restitution, and a mandatory surcharge of $40.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing a mandatory surcharge of $40. As so modified, the sentence is affirmed. The defendant may make an application to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a refund of the $40, and upon proof that payment has been made, his application shall be granted.

Where a defendant has made restitution, he shall not be required to pay a mandatory surcharge (see, Penal Law § 60.35 [6]; People v Neff, 110 AD2d 721). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), imposed February 10, 1986, upon his conviction of forgery in the third degree (three counts), upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of 60 days running concurrently therewith and as a condition thereof, three years’ probation with restitution, and a mandatory surcharge of $40.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing a mandatory surcharge of $40. As so modified, the sentence is affirmed. The defendant may make an application to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a refund of the $40, and upon proof that payment has been made, his application shall be granted.

Where a defendant has made restitution, he shall not be required to pay a mandatory surcharge (see, Penal Law § 60.35 [6]; People v Neff, 110 AD2d 721). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

People v. DeVita, 132 A.D.2d 616, 517 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

132 A.D.2d 616 (People v. DeVita) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related