People v. Devine

300 A.D.2d 598, 751 N.Y.S.2d 868

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered May 3, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The Supreme Court erred in admitting testimony of prior criminal acts by the defendant on the People’s direct case pursuant to People v Molineux (168 NY 264) to prove an absence of mistake (see People v Heiss, 221 AD2d 562, 563; People v Jones, 201 AD2d 504, 505). Because the error was not harmless, a new trial is ordered.

In light of this determination, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contention. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Devine, 300 A.D.2d 598, 751 N.Y.S.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 598 (People v. Devine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Molineux
61 N.E. 286 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
People v. Heiss
221 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Jones
201 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)