People v. Devine
This text of 237 A.D. 890 (People v. Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and a new trial granted. In our opinion the court’s rulings at folios 487-490, 492—495, 648-650, 891-896, [891]*891947-949, 572-576, 651-656, 788-790, 666-667, 669-670, 86-89, 131-132, 133-135, 168-172, 243, 660-661, 683-684, 690-693, were erroneous arid prejudicial, and we think that prejudice against the defendant was excited in the minds of the jurors by comments, rulings and questions by the court throughout the trial, and that the court went beyond reasonable and proper limits in the cross-examination of defendant’s witnesses. We have examined the record and find no error as to the facts. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-devine-nyappdiv-1933.