People v. Devine
This text of 59 Cal. 630 (People v. Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this cause, in which the defendant was accused by information of an assault with intent to commit murder, the Court instructed the jury inter alia as follows: “An assault to commit murder is an unlawful intent coupled with a present ability to kill a human being with malice aforethought.”
To this there was an exception by defendant. It is manifestly erroneous, and was so admitted to be by the Attorney General. It omits an essential element to constitute the offense, viz., an attempt on the part of the accused, which attempt must itself be unlawful. This necessary constituent of the offense is ignored entirely in the instruction excepted to. (Penal Code, § 240.)
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cal. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-devine-cal-1881.