People v. Devaney
This text of 100 A.D.3d 1016 (People v. Devaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), imposed April 6, 2011, on the grounds, inter alia, that the sentences are illegal.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentences imposed were not illegal.
Although the defendant’s remaining contentions also survive an otherwise valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]), they are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 A.D.3d 1016, 954 N.Y.S.2d 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-devaney-nyappdiv-2012.