People v. Deutchman

240 A.D.2d 757, 660 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7097
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered February 21, 1996, convicting him of custodial interference in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issues raised by the defendant was forfeited by virtue of his plea of guilty (see, People v Levin, 57 NY2d 1008; People v Dunbar, 53 NY2d 868). Nor can the conditional nature of the instant plea of guilty, entered on [758] December 20, 1995, serve to preserve these issues for appellate review (see, People v O’Brien, 84 AD2d 567, affd 56 NY2d 1009; People v Di Donato, 87 NY2d 992). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Deutchman, 240 A.D.2d 757, 660 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 757 (People v. Deutchman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pinero
253 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)