People v. DeSalvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeSalvo

32 A.D.3d 1239, 820 N.Y.S.2d 828

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.3d 1239 (People v. DeSalvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeSalvo, 32 A.D.3d 1239, 820 N.Y.S.2d 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered May 4, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). County Court’s determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-n [3]; People v Hegazy, 25 AD3d 675 [2006]) and the record does not warrant a downward departure from defendant’s presumptively correct risk classification (see People v Glover, 28 AD3d 1187 [2006]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered May 4, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). County Court’s determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-n [3]; People v Hegazy, 25 AD3d 675 [2006]) and the record does not warrant a downward departure from defendant’s presumptively correct risk classification (see People v Glover, 28 AD3d 1187 [2006]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.3d 1239, 820 N.Y.S.2d 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-desalvo-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack