People v. Derrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Derrick

121 A.D.2d 560, 503 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58543

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 560 (People v. Derrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Derrick, 121 A.D.2d 560, 503 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered May 2, 1984, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Having failed to raise any objections to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance, the defendant failed to preserve this claim for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered with a full understanding of its consequences (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered May 2, 1984, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Having failed to raise any objections to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance, the defendant failed to preserve this claim for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, we find that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered with a full understanding of its consequences (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 560, 503 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-derrick-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack