People v. Derrick
This text of 27 A.D.2d 889 (People v. Derrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there was presented, and necessarily passed upon, a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: appellant contended that his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment were violated. This court held that there was no violation of appellant’s [890]*890rights.” Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 889, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-derrick-nyappdiv-1967.