People v. Dennis

219 A.D.2d 733, 631 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dennis. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 A.D.2d 843

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence establishing that the house was a "[djwelling”, pursuant to Penal Law § 140.00 (3), is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the house was a "[d]welling”, which is defined as "a building which is usually occupied by a person lodging therein at night” (Penal Law § 140.00 [3]; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620; People v Windbush, 202 AD2d 527).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dennis, 219 A.D.2d 733, 631 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 733 (People v. Dennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Windbush
202 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)