People v. Denner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Denner

260 A.D. 1045, 24 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6000

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 1045 (People v. Denner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Denner, 260 A.D. 1045, 24 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens [County of Queens], convicting the defendant of the crime of petit larceny, reversed on the law and the facts, the information dismissed, and the defendant discharged. The finding of the eye-glass ease of the complaining witness in the Plymouth automobile was not sufficient evidence, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens [County of Queens], convicting the defendant of the crime of petit larceny, reversed on the law and the facts, the information dismissed, and the defendant discharged. The finding of the eye-glass ease of the complaining witness in the Plymouth automobile was not sufficient evidence, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 1045, 24 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-denner-nyappdiv-1940.