People v. Denisha D.-L.

204 A.D.3d 689, 163 N.Y.S.3d 858, 2022 NY Slip Op 02276
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 6, 2022
DocketInd. No. 8782/16
StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.3d 689 (People v. Denisha D.-L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Denisha D.-L., 204 A.D.3d 689, 163 N.Y.S.3d 858, 2022 NY Slip Op 02276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Denisha D.-L. (2022 NY Slip Op 02276)
People v Denisha D.-L.
2022 NY Slip Op 02276
Decided on April 6, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 6, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

2017-09178
(Ind. No. 8782/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Denisha D.-L. (Anonymous), appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anders Nelson of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dineen Riviezzo, J.), rendered July 18, 2017, adjudicating her a youthful offender, upon her plea of guilty to assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating so much of the sentence as imposed mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating the surcharges and fees imposed on the defendant at sentencing (see People v Jeorid G., 200 AD3d 1069; People v Henry P.-M., 196 AD3d 650; People v Dyshawn B., 196 AD3d 638).

BARROS, J.P., IANNACCI, CHAMBERS and DOWLING, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Henry P.-M.
2021 NY Slip Op 04499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Santana v. Pena
2021 NY Slip Op 04486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Jeorid G.
2021 NY Slip Op 07556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.3d 689, 163 N.Y.S.3d 858, 2022 NY Slip Op 02276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-denisha-d-l-nyappdiv-2022.