Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Denham

People v. Denham

102 A.D.2d 895, 477 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19129
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 25, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 895 (People v. Denham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Denham, 102 A.D.2d 895, 477 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), imposed February 20, 1980, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second and third degrees, upon a jury verdict. 11 Resentence affirmed. H We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.2d 895, 477 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-denham-nyappdiv-1984.