People v. Demortel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Demortel

197 A.D.2d 842, 602 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 842 (People v. Demortel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Demortel, 197 A.D.2d 842, 602 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Upon his pleas of guilty to the charges of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3]), and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 145.00 [3]), defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of incarceration of one year and a consecutive term of six months, respectively. The District Attorney has conceded that Penal Law § 70.25 compels the conclusion that the imposition of a consecutive term was improper. Thus, we modify the judgment by providing that all sentences run concurrently (see, People v Taylor, 197 AD2d 858 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.—Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Upon his pleas of guilty to the charges of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c]), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3]), and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 145.00 [3]), defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of incarceration of one year and a consecutive term of six months, respectively. The District Attorney has conceded that Penal Law § 70.25 compels the conclusion that the imposition of a consecutive term was improper. Thus, we modify the judgment by providing that all sentences run concurrently (see, People v Taylor, 197 AD2d 858 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.—Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 842, 602 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-demortel-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack