People v. Delston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Delston

62 A.D.3d 1023, 878 N.Y.S.2d 912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.D.3d 1023 (People v. Delston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Delston, 62 A.D.3d 1023, 878 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from so much of an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered July 2, 2007, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPL 440.20 to vacate a sentence of the same court (Belli, J.), imposed February 25, 2004, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was, in effect, to vacate his sentence (see People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961, 962-963 [1989]; People v Hamilton, 205 AD2d 706, 707 [1994]). Rivera, J.P., Covello, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from so much of an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered July 2, 2007, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPL 440.20 to vacate a sentence of the same court (Belli, J.), imposed February 25, 2004, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was, in effect, to vacate his sentence (see People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961, 962-963 [1989]; People v Hamilton, 205 AD2d 706, 707 [1994]). Rivera, J.P., Covello, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.3d 1023, 878 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-delston-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack