People v. DeLoatch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeLoatch

122 A.D.2d 68, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 68 (People v. DeLoatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeLoatch, 122 A.D.2d 68, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered June 22, 1983, convicting him of kidnapping in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which sought the suppression of identification testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932). We have reviewed the defendant’s other contentions, including his claim that Criminal Term improperly denied [69]*69that branch of his omnibus motion which sought to suppress identification testimony, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered June 22, 1983, convicting him of kidnapping in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which sought the suppression of identification testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 US 932). We have reviewed the defendant’s other contentions, including his claim that Criminal Term improperly denied [69]*69that branch of his omnibus motion which sought to suppress identification testimony, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 68, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-deloatch-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack