People v. DeLinois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeLinois

278 A.D.2d 240, 716 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12594

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 240 (People v. DeLinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeLinois, 278 A.D.2d 240, 716 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), both rendered November 24, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 98-00312, and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 98-00373, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), both rendered November 24, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 98-00312, and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 98-00373, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 240, 716 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-delinois-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack