People v. Delgado
This text of 14 A.D.3d 449 (People v. Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J., at plea; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered July 8, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s claim that he was entitled to a hearing on the issue of whether he violated the terms of his plea agreement is unpreserved since he never requested a hearing or moved to withdraw his plea (see e.g. People v Battle, 287 AD2d 361 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 751 [2002]), and we decline to review it in [450]*450the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that after a sufficient inquiry into defendant’s explanation for his departure from a drug program, the sentencing court properly determined that defendant violated his plea agreement by leaving the program without obtaining permission or making any effort to return, and by having to be brought back to the court on a bench warrant four months later (see e.g. People v Villar, 10 AD3d 564 [2004]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.3d 449, 788 N.Y.S.2d 370, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-delgado-nyappdiv-2005.