People v. Delgado

237 A.D.2d 972, 656 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3591
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that the failure of defense counsel to advise him of his right to appeal, after pronouncement of sentence, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a) renders the waiver of his right to appeal invalid. Defendant knowingly, intelligently and volun[973] tarily waived his right to appeal. The contention that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe does not survive that waiver (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Beaner, 219 AD2d 827, lv denied 87 NY2d 898; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092, 1093, lv denied 81 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Donalty, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Delgado, 237 A.D.2d 972, 656 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 972 (People v. Delgado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. West
239 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)