People v. Delgado
This text of 225 A.D.2d 478 (People v. Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[479]*479The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motions without a hearing. The law of the case doctrine was not binding since exceptional circumstances existed, warranting reconsideration of the previous order directing a Dunaway hearing. Defendant’s moving papers did not warrant a hearing (People v Marte, 207 AD2d 314, 316, lv denied 84 NY2d 937), and the trial court was considerably more familiar with the facts of the case than the motion court. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 478, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-delgado-nyappdiv-1996.