People v. Delgado
225 A.D.2d 478, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 26, 1996·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
[479] The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motions without a hearing. The law of the case doctrine was not binding since exceptional circumstances existed, warranting reconsideration of the previous order directing a Dunaway hearing. Defendant’s moving papers did not warrant a hearing (People v Marte, 207 AD2d 314, 316, lv denied 84 NY2d 937), and the trial court was considerably more familiar with the facts of the case than the motion court. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Delgado, 225 A.D.2d 478, 639 N.Y.2d 918, 639 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 478 (People v. Delgado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bezjak
11 Misc. 3d 424 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2006)
People v. Sharp
279 A.D.2d 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Leon
264 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Cabreja
243 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Perrilla
240 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)