People v. DeLeon

236 A.D.2d 621, 654 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1512
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. DeLeon. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 A.D.2d 430

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Orgera, J.), rendered June 12, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the evidence at trial was legally insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review because the motion for a trial order of dismissal lacked specificity (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v McGee, 204 AD2d 353). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. DeLeon, 236 A.D.2d 621, 654 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 621 (People v. DeLeon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bynum
518 N.E.2d 4 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Mcgee
204 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)