People v. Delacruz

183 A.D.2d 911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Delacruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 A.D.2d 717

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered May 8, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the People reneged on a promise, made at the time he pleaded guilty, that they would consent to a withdrawal of the guilty plea and to a plea to a lesser crime with a lesser sentence, if the defendant cooperated with the District Attorney’s office. This claim was not raised before the Supreme Court when sentence was imposed. Thus, the issue of the sentencing commitment has not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d [912]*912636; People v Madison, 173 AD2d 563, 564; People v Ifill, 108 AD2d 202, 205). Sullivan, J. P., Harwood, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Delacruz, 183 A.D.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

183 A.D.2d 911 (People v. Delacruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Ifill
108 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Madison
173 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)