People v. DeJesus

2017 NY Slip Op 9153, 156 A.D.3d 899, 65 N.Y.S.3d 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. DeJesus. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 A.D.3d 1047
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2017·No. 2016-04071·Published

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mullen, J.), both imposed March 23, 2016, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; People v Little, 127 AD3d 1235, 1235-1236 [2015]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. DeJesus, 2017 NY Slip Op 9153, 156 A.D.3d 899, 65 N.Y.S.3d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 9153 (People v. DeJesus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Little
127 A.D.3d 1235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)