People v. DeJesus

9 A.D.3d 470, 779 N.Y.S.2d 915
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. DeJesus. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 A.D.3d 753

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered August 8, 1994, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor’s summation deprived him of due process and a fair trial are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886 [1991]; People v Brownridge, 267 AD2d 318 [1999]). In any event, the prosecutor’s statements constituted fair responses to remarks, made by the defense counsel during summation (see People v Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821 [1993]; People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105 [1976]; People v Ryant, 278 AD2d 345 [2000]). Santucci, J.E, Schmidt, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. DeJesus, 9 A.D.3d 470, 779 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

9 A.D.3d 470 (People v. DeJesus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dien
571 N.E.2d 69 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Ashwal
347 N.E.2d 564 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Halm
611 N.E.2d 281 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Ryant
278 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Brownridge
267 A.D.2d 318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)