People v. DeJesus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeJesus

223 A.D.2d 653, 637 N.Y.S.2d 318, 636 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 438

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 653 (People v. DeJesus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeJesus, 223 A.D.2d 653, 637 N.Y.S.2d 318, 636 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), rendered November 16, 1994, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and jostling, upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), rendered November 16, 1994, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and jostling, upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 653, 637 N.Y.S.2d 318, 636 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dejesus-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack