People v. DeFreitas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeFreitas

95 A.D.3d 902, 942 N.Y.S.2d 816

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, an opinion and order of this Court dated August 14, 1995 (People v DeFreitas, 213 AD2d 96 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 9, 1992.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, an opinion and order of this Court dated August 14, 1995 (People v DeFreitas, 213 AD2d 96 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 9, 1992.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

People v. DeFreitas, 95 A.D.3d 902, 942 N.Y.S.2d 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

95 A.D.3d 902 (People v. DeFreitas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related