People v. DeFreitas

201 A.D.2d 578, 609 N.Y.S.2d 808

This text of 201 A.D.2d 578 (People v. DeFreitas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. DeFreitas, 201 A.D.2d 578, 609 N.Y.S.2d 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), both rendered December 2, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree (two counts; one as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that he was denied an opportunity to explain why he failed to appear for sentencing is without merit. In addition, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Delgado
80 N.Y.2d 780 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 578, 609 N.Y.S.2d 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-defreitas-nyappdiv-1994.