People v. DeFrancesco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeFrancesco

176 A.D.2d 956

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D.2d 956 (People v. DeFrancesco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeFrancesco, 176 A.D.2d 956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered June 15, 1990, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, "the evidence established a violation of probation” (cf., People v DeFrancesco, 136 AD2d 561) in that he failed to make scheduled restitution payments. We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered June 15, 1990, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, "the evidence established a violation of probation” (cf., People v DeFrancesco, 136 AD2d 561) in that he failed to make scheduled restitution payments. We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D.2d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-defrancesco-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack