People v. Decker
This text of 277 A.D.2d 394 (People v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered July 28, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The Trial Judge providently exercised his discretion with respect to challenges made during voir dire (see, CPL 270.20 [1] [b]; People v Biondo, 41 NY2d 483, cert denied 434 US 928; People v Thomas, 244 AD2d 271), and in refusing to charge the lesser-included offenses requested by the defendant (see, People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 394, 716 N.Y.S.2d 331, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-decker-nyappdiv-2000.