People v. DeChristopher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeChristopher

51 A.D.2d 750, 379 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11288

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 750 (People v. DeChristopher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeChristopher, 51 A.D.2d 750, 379 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 16, 1974, affirmed (People v Baker, 48 AD2d 662). In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the indication of the claim of privilege on the part of a People’s witness because that witness thereafter admitted her participation in the sale of drugs with defendant. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 16, 1974, affirmed (People v Baker, 48 AD2d 662). In any event, defendant was not prejudiced by the indication of the claim of privilege on the part of a People’s witness because that witness thereafter admitted her participation in the sale of drugs with defendant. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 750, 379 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dechristopher-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack