People v. Decesare
This text of 112 A.D.2d 167 (People v. Decesare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Alfano, J.), rendered February 23, 1984, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The evidence adduced at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied — US —, 105 S Ct 327; People v Benzinger, 36 NY2d 29), is sufficient to sustain the conviction. Moreover, defendant’s claim that he was deprived of a fair trial as a result of certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation has not been preserved for review as a matter of law (People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865; People v Jalah, 107 AD2d 762; People v Thompson, 97 AD2d 554) and, in any event, lacks merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.2d 167, 491 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-decesare-nyappdiv-1985.