People v. DeBoard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeBoard

267 A.D.2d 960, 701 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13666

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 960 (People v. DeBoard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeBoard, 267 A.D.2d 960, 701 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from [961]*961a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]) and sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts) (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]). Defendant contends that he was deprived of due process by virtue of the fact that time periods charged in the indictment were insufficiently specific to give him fair notice of the charges. Defendant’s plea of guilty precludes our review of that contention (see, People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 600-601; People v George, 261 AD2d 711, lv denied 93 NY2d 1018; People v Duboy, 150 AD2d 882, 884, lv denied 74 NY2d 846). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from [961]*961a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [1]) and sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts) (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]). Defendant contends that he was deprived of due process by virtue of the fact that time periods charged in the indictment were insufficiently specific to give him fair notice of the charges. Defendant’s plea of guilty precludes our review of that contention (see, People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 600-601; People v George, 261 AD2d 711, lv denied 93 NY2d 1018; People v Duboy, 150 AD2d 882, 884, lv denied 74 NY2d 846). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 960, 701 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-deboard-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack