People v. DeBaptiste

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. DeBaptiste

237 A.D.2d 298, 655 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2060

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 298 (People v. DeBaptiste) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. DeBaptiste, 237 A.D.2d 298, 655 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered July 27, 1995, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to inform him prior to summations that it would be considering the lesser-included offense of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. However, the court’s error in this regard was harmless, as it cannot be said that defense counsel’s summation would have been affected by the knowledge that attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree would be considered by the trier of fact (see, People v Kloska, 191 AD2d 587; People v Taylor, 164 AD2d 922).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered July 27, 1995, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to inform him prior to summations that it would be considering the lesser-included offense of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. However, the court’s error in this regard was harmless, as it cannot be said that defense counsel’s summation would have been affected by the knowledge that attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree would be considered by the trier of fact (see, People v Kloska, 191 AD2d 587; People v Taylor, 164 AD2d 922).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 298, 655 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-debaptiste-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack