People v. Dearie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dearie

282 A.D.2d 543, 722 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3642

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 543 (People v. Dearie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dearie, 282 A.D.2d 543, 722 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), both rendered January 21, 2000, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the third degree under Indictment No. 1451/99 and forgery in the second degree under Indictment No. 2421/99, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), both rendered January 21, 2000, convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the third degree under Indictment No. 1451/99 and forgery in the second degree under Indictment No. 2421/99, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 543, 722 N.Y.S.2d 888, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dearie-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack