People v. Dean

188 A.D.2d 1082, 592 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14978
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1992·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Reversal is required because defendant’s absence from the in-chambers Sandoval hearing deprived him of his constitutional right to be present during all material stages of the trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656, 662; People v Beasley, 80 NY2d 981; People v Kirkland, 188 AD2d 1083 [decided herewith]). The fact that the court made its Sandoval ruling in defendant’s presence is insufficient to satisfy defendant’s right to be present at the Sandoval hearing (see, People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995, revg 181 AD2d 692; People v Eady, 185 AD2d 678).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Sirkin, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present-Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dean, 188 A.D.2d 1082, 592 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 1082 (People v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fuller
197 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Young
195 A.D.2d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Russell
191 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Kirkland
188 A.D.2d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)