People v. Dean

393 N.E.2d 1030, 47 N.Y.2d 967, 419 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2213
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 9, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 393 N.E.2d 1030 (People v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dean, 393 N.E.2d 1030, 47 N.Y.2d 967, 419 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2213 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the plea vacated, and the motion to suppress granted.

In response to a series of questions posed by an Assistant District Attorney, defendant, while in police custody, refused to make a statement to the authorities without the assistance of an attorney. On the conceded facts, it must be held as a matter of law that defendant requested the assistance of counsel (People v Hinton, 45 NY2d 941; People v Clark, 45 NY2d 432, 436, 439). As a result, the police and the prosecutor became duty bound not to question defendant without first scrupulously honoring his right to counsel (People v Grant, 45 NY2d 366; People v Buxton, 44 NY2d 33). This they failed to do. Rather than taking steps to assist defendant in obtaining counsel, the police merely returned him to a holding pen. A few hours later, after defendant had co-operated in certain respects, they affirmatively sought and obtained a waiver of his rights. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that defendant’s refusal to answer questions without the aid of counsel was scrupulously honored.

Although defendant may not have adequately preserved the error, a violation of the right to counsel may be reviewed in the absence of an objection (People v Ermo, 47 NY2d 863; People v Arthur, 22 NY2d 325, 329). We deem this rule equally applicable to the circumstances of this case.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order reversed, plea vacated, motion to suppress granted and case remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings on the indictment in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Robbins
33 A.D.3d 1127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Strudwick
170 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Esquillin
143 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Covington
140 Misc. 2d 871 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
People v. Saunders
140 Misc. 2d 544 (New York Supreme Court, 1988)
People v. Romero
137 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Gamble
129 A.D.2d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Schiavi
475 N.E.2d 121 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Stringfellow
123 Misc. 2d 476 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Speller
121 Misc. 2d 354 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Corti
88 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Jenkins
85 A.D.2d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Charleston
425 N.E.2d 881 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Carmine A.
422 N.E.2d 575 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Banks
422 N.E.2d 576 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Yarusevich
81 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Pawlyshyn
77 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Pepper
76 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Cunningham
400 N.E.2d 360 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Stroh
401 N.E.2d 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 N.E.2d 1030, 47 N.Y.2d 967, 419 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dean-ny-1979.