People v. De Vito

438 N.E.2d 874, 56 N.Y.2d 846, 453 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3472
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 1982·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Although it was inappropriate for the trial court to address counsel as it did in the presence of the jury, it was not error for the court to prevent counsel from cross-examining the witness concerning the possibility of her receiving a life sentence, a risk to which the defendant was also exposed.

No door had been opened to this inquiry and it was not necessary to specify the potential sentence in order to explain to the jury the extent of the arrangement the witness had made with the prosecutor for a grant of immunity (People v Roth, 30 NY2d 99).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. De Vito, 438 N.E.2d 874, 56 N.Y.2d 846, 453 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3472 (N.Y. 1982).

438 N.E.2d 874 (People v. De Vito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gomez
135 A.D.3d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Bisnett
144 A.D.2d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Cobos
441 N.E.2d 1106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)