People v. De Vine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Vine

92 A.D.2d 467, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16664

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Fourth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no such violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur ■— Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Silver-man, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “Upon the appeal herein there were presented, and necessarily passed upon, questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his rights under the Fourth and Sixth Amendments of the United States Constitution were violated. The Appellate Division held that there was no such violation of appellant’s rights.” Concur ■— Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Silver-man, Bloom and Fein, JJ.

People v. De Vine, 92 A.D.2d 467, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 467 (People v. De Vine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.