People v. De Sousa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Sousa

119 A.D.2d 586, 500 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55516

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 586 (People v. De Sousa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Sousa, 119 A.D.2d 586, 500 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered April 1, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have examined the record and conclude that there was sufficient independent evidence corroborating the testimony of George Owens and Lisa Amato, the defendant’s accomplices, that tended to connect the defendant with the crime charged, namely, robbery in the first degree (see, CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Moses, 63 NY2d 299, 306). We have reviewed the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered April 1, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have examined the record and conclude that there was sufficient independent evidence corroborating the testimony of George Owens and Lisa Amato, the defendant’s accomplices, that tended to connect the defendant with the crime charged, namely, robbery in the first degree (see, CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Moses, 63 NY2d 299, 306). We have reviewed the defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 586, 500 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-sousa-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack