People v. De Quaro

121 A.D.2d 559, 503 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58542
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered May 5, 1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[560] Judgment affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. A review of the record does not show any facts which would warrant a finding that the conduct of defense counsel fell below the professional standard of reasonableness or that the defendant was prejudiced thereby. The utilization of a reasonable trial strategy, even though unsuccessful, does not render counsel ineffective (see, People v Dudley, 110 AD2d 652). We conclude, therefore, that the defendant was provided with meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. De Quaro, 121 A.D.2d 559, 503 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

121 A.D.2d 559 (People v. De Quaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Codner
134 A.D.2d 272 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)