People v. De Mino

New York Court of Appeals

People v. De Mino

273 N.E.2d 133, 29 N.Y.2d 602, 324 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1116

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 7, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 N.E.2d 133 (People v. De Mino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Mino, 273 N.E.2d 133, 29 N.Y.2d 602, 324 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1116 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: There was no showing of actual prejudice beyond the fact of the retrial itself, to which the defense — differing from that in Price v. Georgia (398 U. S. 323)—interposed no objection (see People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A D 2d 693, affd. 24 N Y 2d 949; People ex rel. Elias v. Follette, 32 A D 2d 929, mot. for lv. to app. den. 25 N Y 2d 742).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Beegan, Beeitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: There was no showing of actual prejudice beyond the fact of the retrial itself, to which the defense — differing from that in Price v. Georgia (398 U. S. 323)—interposed no objection (see People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A D 2d 693, affd. 24 N Y 2d 949; People ex rel. Elias v. Follette, 32 A D 2d 929, mot. for lv. to app. den. 25 N Y 2d 742).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Beegan, Beeitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 N.E.2d 133, 29 N.Y.2d 602, 324 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-mino-ny-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack