People v. De Mino
273 N.E.2d 133, 29 N.Y.2d 602, 324 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1116
Opinion
Order affirmed in the following memorandum: There was no showing of actual prejudice beyond the fact of the retrial itself, to which the defense — differing from that in Price v. Georgia (398 U. S. 323)—interposed no objection (see People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A D 2d 693, affd. 24 N Y 2d 949; People ex rel. Elias v. Follette, 32 A D 2d 929, mot. for lv. to app. den. 25 N Y 2d 742).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Beegan, Beeitel, Jasen and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. De Mino, 273 N.E.2d 133, 29 N.Y.2d 602, 324 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1116 (N.Y. 1971).
273 N.E.2d 133 (People v. De Mino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Pendleton v. Smith
83 Misc. 2d 503 (Wyoming County Court, 1975)