People v. De Marco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Marco

254 A.D. 921, 5 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 921 (People v. De Marco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Marco, 254 A.D. 921, 5 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order and judgment of the Children’s Court of Schenectady county dated June 5, 1936, and filed in the clerk’s office of that court on the same day convicting defendant of being the father of a female child bom to complainant out of wedlock on May 10, 1936. On this appeal defendant contends that the order of filiation is against the weight of the evidence and that the trial judge erred in not permitting defendant to offer evidence as to his good character. The order appealed from is sustained by the proof. On the trial defendant made no attempt to prove his good character and the trial judge stated that his character was not an issue. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order and judgment of the Children’s Court of Schenectady county dated June 5, 1936, and filed in the clerk’s office of that court on the same day convicting defendant of being the father of a female child bom to complainant out of wedlock on May 10, 1936. On this appeal defendant contends that the order of filiation is against the weight of the evidence and that the trial judge erred in not permitting defendant to offer evidence as to his good character. The order appealed from is sustained by the proof. On the trial defendant made no attempt to prove his good character and the trial judge stated that his character was not an issue. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 921, 5 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-marco-nyappdiv-1938.