People v. De Los Santos

49 A.D.3d 550, 855 N.Y.2d 167
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The voluntariness of the defendant’s waiver of his Miranda rights (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]) was unaffected by any alleged difficulty he might have had in understanding or communicating in the English language (see People v Mora, 36 AD3d 1142, 1143 [2007]; People v Restivo, 226 AD2d 1106, 1107 [1996]). The defendant’s argument concerning the alleged suggestivity of the photo array displayed to a civilian witness is without merit (see People v Leka, 209 AD2d 723, 724 [1994]). Accordingly, the County Court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress the photo array.

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. De Los Santos, 49 A.D.3d 550, 855 N.Y.2d 167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 550 (People v. De Los Santos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jian Qun Hunag
2024 NY Slip Op 50611(U) (New York Supreme Court, Queens County, 2024)
People v. Coble
84 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)