People v. De Los Santos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Los Santos

187 A.D.2d 726, 591 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 726 (People v. De Los Santos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Los Santos, 187 A.D.2d 726, 591 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered April 26, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The defendant seeks review of the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part his plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Lawrence, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered April 26, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The defendant seeks review of the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part his plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Lawrence, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 726, 591 N.Y.S.2d 798, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-los-santos-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack