People v. De La Rosa

233 A.D.2d 257, 650 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12151
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 257 (People v. De La Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. De La Rosa, 233 A.D.2d 257, 650 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Stackhouse, J.), rendered March 30, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and criminal mischief in the third degree and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, 5 to 15 years and 21/s to 7 years, respectively, and a consecutive term of l1/3 to 4 years on the criminal mischief conviction, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, which established that, evincing a depraved indifference to human life, defendant repeatedly threatened and expressed his desire to his accomplices that the victim be killed; he directed his accomplices to get a gun; and he injured and prevented his victim from escaping while one of his accomplices fired a fatal shot into the victim’s chest (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). Defendant’s challenge to the court’s charge is unpreserved and, in any event, without merit.

The court properly discharged a sworn juror, over defense objection, where the juror was found to have engaged in flirtatious conduct with a co-defendant’s sister and then lied about it to the court. The juror was "grossly unqualified to serve” and had also "engaged in misconduct of a substantial nature.” (CPL 270.35 [1].) There was no basis to discharge any other jurors or to declare a mistrial.

Defendant’s sentence is legal and we decline to reduce it in the interest of justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pizarro
24 A.D.3d 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Havner
19 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Robles
250 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D.2d 257, 650 N.Y.S.2d 641, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-la-rosa-nyappdiv-1996.