Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. De Grandis

People v. De Grandis

187 N.E.2d 130, 12 N.Y.2d 812
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 6, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 187 N.E.2d 130 (People v. De Grandis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. De Grandis, 187 N.E.2d 130, 12 N.Y.2d 812 (N.Y. 1962).

Opinion

Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Froessel dissent and vote to reverse and to order a new trial upon the ground that keeping the jury in deliberation for over 24 consecutive hours without any respite, and after they had advised the court of their fatigue on more than one occasion, constitutes coercion of the jury as matter of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Deforte v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison, Attica, New York
379 F.2d 897 (Second Circuit, 1967)
United States ex rel. DeForte v. Mancusi
261 F. Supp. 579 (W.D. New York, 1966)
Joseph Degrandis v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, Frank Deforte and Ernest Zundel v. Wilfred L. Denno, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison
335 F.2d 173 (Second Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 N.E.2d 130, 12 N.Y.2d 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-grandis-ny-1962.