People v. De Fillipi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Fillipi

25 A.D.2d 730, 269 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 730 (People v. De Fillipi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Fillipi, 25 A.D.2d 730, 269 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment convicting defendants of the crime of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree and, in addition, convicting defendants Thomas Carew and Paul San Fillipo of possession of a weapon, unanimously affirmed as to the defendants other than Thomas Carew. The certificate of reasonable doubt is cancelled and vacated and defendants remanded. The determination of the appeal as to defendant Carew is held in abeyance pending a trial before the court on the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72, 77.) Pending said trial and the determination of this appeal, the certificate of reasonable doubt as to defendant Carew is cancelled and vacated and he is remanded, (See People v. Kazmerski, 13 A D 2d 729; People v. Reger, 13 A D 2d 63, 64.)

Concur — Breitel J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment convicting defendants of the crime of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree and, in addition, convicting defendants Thomas Carew and Paul San Fillipo of possession of a weapon, unanimously affirmed as to the defendants other than Thomas Carew. The certificate of reasonable doubt is cancelled and vacated and defendants remanded. The determination of the appeal as to defendant Carew is held in abeyance pending a trial before the court on the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72, 77.) Pending said trial and the determination of this appeal, the certificate of reasonable doubt as to defendant Carew is cancelled and vacated and he is remanded, (See People v. Kazmerski, 13 A D 2d 729; People v. Reger, 13 A D 2d 63, 64.)

Concur — Breitel J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 730, 269 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-fillipi-nyappdiv-1966.