People v. De Cicco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Cicco

39 A.D.2d 556, 332 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4997

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 556 (People v. De Cicco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Cicco, 39 A.D.2d 556, 332 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 21, 1971, which granted defendant’s motion to arrest and set aside a judgment of conviction and to dismiss the indictment charging defendant with criminal contempt in violation of subdivision 4 of section 215.50 of the Penal Law. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied and indictment reinstated. In our opinion, the immunity granted was as broad as the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination and defendant was given proper and adequate notice as to the scope of the immunity granted (People v. Mulligan, 29 N Y 2d 20; People v. Dellacroce, 38 A D 2d 210). Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 21, 1971, which granted defendant’s motion to arrest and set aside a judgment of conviction and to dismiss the indictment charging defendant with criminal contempt in violation of subdivision 4 of section 215.50 of the Penal Law. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied and indictment reinstated. In our opinion, the immunity granted was as broad as the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination and defendant was given proper and adequate notice as to the scope of the immunity granted (People v. Mulligan, 29 N Y 2d 20; People v. Dellacroce, 38 A D 2d 210). Munder, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 556, 332 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-cicco-nyappdiv-1972.